By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
The NewsmatricsThe NewsmatricsThe Newsmatrics
  • Homepage
  • News
    • Latest
    • From the state
    • Science and Tech
    • News Unusual
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Aviation
    • Maritime
    • Personal Finance
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Opinion
  • Sport
Search
  • Advertise
© 2024 The News Matrics. By Datech.ict. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Appeal court upholdd ruling stopping VIO from fining motorists, impounding vehicles
Sign In
Notification Show More
Aa
The NewsmatricsThe Newsmatrics
Aa
  • Homepage
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Opinion
  • Sport
Search
  • Homepage
  • News
    • Latest
    • From the state
    • Science and Tech
    • News Unusual
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Aviation
    • Maritime
    • Personal Finance
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Opinion
  • Sport
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2024 The News Matrics. By Datech.ict. All Rights Reserved.
News

Appeal court upholdd ruling stopping VIO from fining motorists, impounding vehicles

Last updated: 2025/12/05 at 8:08 AM
tnm
2 Min Read
Advertisements
https://thenewsmatrics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/VID-20260408-WA0000.mp4

 

The Court of Appeal, Abuja Division on Thursday upheld a federal high court judgement barring the directorate of road traffic services (DRTS), also known as the vehicle inspection office (VIO), from stopping motorists, impounding vehicles, or imposing fines on road users.

Last year, Evelyn Maha, the presiding judge, in a suit filed by human rights lawyer Marshal Abubakar, ruled that the VIO, which operates under the control of the minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), has no legal authority to stop or impound vehicles and to fine drivers.

Advertisements

In a unanimous decision on Thursday, a three-member panel of the court dismissed the VIO’s appeal for lacking merit, affirming the earlier ruling by Maha.

Advertisements

The court described the actions of the VIO as oppressive and unlawful and issued a perpetual injunction restraining the directorate and its agents from further violations of motorists’ rights to freedom of movement, presumption of innocence, and ownership of property.

According to the ruling, only a court of competent jurisdiction could impose sanctions or fines, noting that the respondents violated the applicant’s constitutional rights under section 42 of the 1999 Constitution and article 14 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

Advertisements

The court also said the respondents had no statutory powers to impound vehicles or impose fines, adding that such actions breached motorists’ rights to a fair hearing and freedom of movement under various sections of the constitution and provisions of the African Charter.

Marshal, represented by a legal team led by Femi Falana, human rights lawyer and senior advocate of Nigeria (SAN), had sought N500 million in damages and an apology in three national newspapers from the defendants.

The court awarded N2.5 million in damages instead.

 

 

Advertisements
TAGGED: Appeal Court, VIO
Previous Article Nestoil, Neconde to remain under receivership lawyers’ tussle over appeal court representation
Next Article VIO heads to Supreme Court after losing vehicle impoundment appeal
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The NewsmatricsThe Newsmatrics
Follow US
© 2024 The News Matrics. By Datech.ict. All Rights Reserved. Contact: 08057511900
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advert rates
  • Privacy Policy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?